← Published work

Journal Article · 2023

Patients Follow-up for Spinal Epidural Abscess as a Critical Treatment Plan Consideration.

MacNeille R, Lay J, Razzouk J, Bogue S, Harianja G, Ouro-Rodrigues E, Ting C, Ramos O, Veltman J, Danisa O

ManuscriptManuscript

Publication record

Cureus

MacNeille R, Lay J, Razzouk J, Bogue S, Harianja G, Ouro-Rodrigues E, Ting C, Ramos O, Veltman J, Danisa O. Patients Follow-up for Spinal Epidural Abscess as a Critical Treatment Plan Consideration. Cureus. 2023;15(2):e35058. doi:10.7759/cureus.35058. Abstract reproduced from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10023045/. License: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10023045/.

Abstract

Introduction: Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a rare process with significant risk for morbidity and mortality. Treatment includes an extended course of antibiotics with or without surgery depending on the clinical presentation. Both non-operative and surgically treated patients require close follow-up to ensure the resolution of the infection without recurrence and/or progression of neurologic deficits. No previous study has looked specifically at follow-up in the SEA population, but the review of the literature does show evidence of varying degrees of difficulty with follow-up for this patient population. Methods: This retrospective review looked at follow-up for 147 patients with SEA at a single institution from 2012 to 2021. Statistical analyses were performed to assess differences between groups of surgical versus non-surgical patients and those with adequate versus inadequate follow-up. Results: Sixty-two of 147 (42.2%) patients had inadequate follow-up (less than 90 days) with their surgical team, and 112 of 147 (76.2%) patients had inadequate follow-up (less than 90 days) with infectious disease (ID). The primary statistically significant difference between patients with adequate versus inadequate follow-up was found to be surgical status with those treated surgically more likely to have adequate follow-up than those treated non-operatively. Conclusion: Improved follow-up in surgical patients should be considered as a factor when deciding on surgical versus non-operative treatment in the SEA patient population. Extra efforts coordinating follow-up care should be made for SEA patients.